Home | Obesity Forums | Register | VB Image Host | Members | FAQ’s | Today’s Posts | Friends of OD: Add your Site! | New Posts | Zylene | Calendar
Obesity Discussion Forums > Diet Recipes > Diet Forum

Better diet through genomics



Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-07, 07:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Obesity Discussion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,851

Weight Statistics

8/1/2006
Start Date:
185 lb
Start Weight:
152 lb
Current Weight:
155 lb
Goal Weight:
-33 lb
Weight Loss:
5/1/2007
Goal Date:
Send a message via AIM to Obesity Discussion Send a message via Yahoo to Obesity Discussion
Better diet through genomics

Better diet through genomics

Sales of food with added health benefits have reached $25 billion annually, and big companies are taking notice, says Fortune Matthew Boyle.


By Matthew Boyle, Fortune writer
March 23 2007: 2:10 PM EDT
NEW YORK (Fortune) -- Wandering through the aisles of the local grocery store, one can't help but notice the number of everyday food products that now feature some added health benefit.
These so-called "functional foods" include calcium-laced orange juice, pasta fortified with omega-3 fatty acids - even your beloved bowl of Cheerios now comes with a heart-healthy message. Sales of such foods have reached $25 billion annually and are growing at a double-digit clip, prompting big companies like Kraft (Charts), Kellogg (Charts), and General Mills (Charts) to take notice.
One company that's hoping to attract some attention in this burgeoning field is WellGen, a startup spun out of Rutgers University back in 1997. WellGen's focus is nutrigenomics, which is the study of how food ingredients affect our genes, particularly those related to the onset and prevention of disease.
"Consumers are beginning to realize that we bring two things to the dinner table - our appetite and our genotype," says Raymond Rodriguez, director of the Center for Excellence in Nutritional Genomics at the University of California, Davis.
While the pharmaceutical and biotech industries have incorporated genomics into their research and development efforts for some time, food companies are just starting to unlock its potential. In an interview with Fortune, Nestle CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe expressed great interest in nutrigenomics and outlined how his company plans to capitalize on this space.
Back in November 2001, Nestle was a co-sponsor, along with Unilever (Charts), of a conference in the Netherlands that looked at how genomics would influence the food industry. Researchers at Nestle, the world's largest food company with $75 billion in annual sales, have been studying the subject for several years alongside scientists around the world, and just last month, Nestle promised to pay $80,000 a year to Mexico's National Institute of Genomic Medicine to recruit a head researcher in nutrigenomics.
"Our scientists have broadened their knowledge in the genomic and nutrigenomics sciences," says Nestle spokesperson Robin Tickle. "These emerging technologies allow the understanding of how diet influences genes and the metabolism."
But as with any nascent field, much of the exciting developments come from smaller, nimbler outfits like WellGen. After many years toiling in the lab, not to mention weathering the sudden death of its former CEO last year, WellGen now has a pair of food ingredients primed for commercialization - if it can find a willing food company partner.
One product, a powdered, enriched black tea extract, fights inflammation, while the other ingredient battles obesity by hampering fat cell development. Of the two, the black tea product is further along in development and has already shown promising results in human tests on so-called "biomarkers" for inflammation. (Biomarkers, which include cholesterol and glucose levels, can indicate a desired response from a therapeutic intervention.) Inflammation is a factor in many health conditions including cardiovascular disease and osteoarthritis.
WellGen plans to sell the black tea ingredient in capsule form as a nutritional supplement later this year, and is talking to eight leading food companies about putting it into everything from beverages to cookies.
"There's so much pressure on food companies to get healthier stuff out there," says WellGen CEO Kathleen Mullinix, who sports a doctorate in chemical biology and whose most recent venture was a biotech start-up, Synaptic Pharmaceutical, which was acquired in 2003. "We provide the innovation they need."
The major innovation, in this case, is in the form of a patent - owned by Rutgers and exclusively licensed by WellGen - for a biotechnology screening process that identifies food and plant extracts that regulate gene expression. WellGen also plans to make money by allowing food companies to use that screening process to test their existing stockpiles of ingredients and see if any have disease-fighting capabilities. "The back rooms of food companies are gold mines, but they need technology to unlock the value," she says.
Down the road, WellGen is also exploring ingredients that improve cognition and heart health.
Of course, WellGen is not the first startup company to seek its fortune in this field. Founded in 1985, Martek Biosciences (Charts) produces a vegetarian source of the omega-3 fatty acid DHA (naturally found in fatty fish) for use in infant formula, yogurt, and milk.
But despite great promise, Martek has struggled for years to convince dubious food companies to add DHA to their products, and some nutritionists have questioned the company's broad health claims. Martek's stock now trades at $20, a huge drop from its high of $71 in May 2004.
Mullinix doubts that WellGen will suffer a similar fate. "This is a different time," she says. "I don't know when food companies will decide that they have to do this, but it will happen. It's a question of when, not whether."


[b]http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/22/news/companies/pluggedin_boyle_wellgen.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007032314]Better diet through genomics
__________________
Obesity Discussion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-07, 06:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Re: Better diet through genomics

I believe in the big potential that such convergent technologies have: mainly to dictinguish between misleading health claims and substantiated health claims made on functional foods. I also think that it can offer an additional incentive to convince the public that the simple message of "eat more fruit and vegs and less fat" is still the best one . On the other hand, the pharma food trend reenforces the weight of false solutions or quick fix. I don't mind companies investing their profits in such technologies but finding (MSc Study see my blog) that a lot of it is sponsored by the government ( US and EU) at huge costs while the first beneficiaries are not the people needing the technology most, make me question the "healthwash " surrounding the nutrigenomics phenomenon .
Rachel C. Dechenne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-07, 04:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
William Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,204

Weight Statistics

8/1/07
Start Date:
245 lb
Start Weight:
194 lb
Current Weight:
180 lb
Goal Weight:
-51 lb
Weight Loss:
12/31/07
Goal Date:
Re: Better diet through genomics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel C. Dechenne View Post
I believe in the big potential that such convergent technologies have: mainly to dictinguish between misleading health claims and substantiated health claims made on functional foods. I also think that it can offer an additional incentive to convince the public that the simple message of "eat more fruit and vegs and less fat" is still the best one . On the other hand, the pharma food trend reenforces the weight of false solutions or quick fix. I don't mind companies investing their profits in such technologies but finding (MSc Study see my blog) that a lot of it is sponsored by the government ( US and EU) at huge costs while the first beneficiaries are not the people needing the technology most, make me question the "healthwash " surrounding the nutrigenomics phenomenon .
Very good points.

What I would like to see from genomics in the future is getting people on diets that will combat the likely diseases one is suseptible to, and obesity as well (for those that are pre-disposed).

There was a great piece on genomics that Obesity Discussion posted within a report called Healthcast 2020. Done by the healthcare consulting group at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Definitely worth the read.

Amazing PricewaterhouseCoopers report on the grim future of healthcare in the US

Oh, and welcome to the site
__________________

Last edited by William Wallace : 04-02-07 at 05:00 PM.
William Wallace is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-07, 04:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Re: Better diet through genomics

Thanks William! the PCW report sounds familiar, particularly the bit presenting genomics as a panacea.
(By the way, I would very much like to read the entire report but I can't access your link . That's what I've got under the Attached Files sign:To view attachments your post count must be 5 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily. ?????)
In a perfect world, genomics would be developed to screen entire population (poor and rich) to find people with predisposition for ill-health and thus prevent suffuring and stigmatization of individuals as well as reducing cost of health care for the society as a whole. However, we don't live in this ideal world and this trajectory, although often praised as the goal, is not in practice the one favoured by the industry backed up by the governments. Why? I leave this to your own appreciation. I pasted a comment from my 2006 dissertation on the "Trajectories of public research in Nutrigenomics in the US and the EU".

5.1 Will public investments in Nutrigenomics advance the role of nutrition in Public Health?
"As for the US public research system, several exchanges with US experts in the field has suggested to me, in a nutshell: “the product-based approach to nutrigenomics research in the USA might be oriented primarily to the pharmaceutical industry interest rather than the food industry or public health interests. One can make money off genes and small molecules that inhibit their protein products, but it may not be as lucrative to do the same with food. This might be because those “chemicals” (naturally occurring from food) cannot be protected and marketed into blockbuster like drug. The direction of the nutrigenomics research enterprise in the US has generated a large windfall for the pharma industry through basic research they do not have to do or fund in house. The research essentially rules out the genes and proteins that cannot produce some drug. Some nutrigenomics researchers, however, pro personalized nutrition, are trying to change the mindset”. At the end of the day, one might look at the nutrigenomics trajectories in the US more like a game between two industries -drug and food - rather than a race towards enhancing public health. "
Cheers,Rachel

Last edited by Rachel C. Dechenne : 04-03-07 at 05:39 AM. Reason: forgot a comment
Rachel C. Dechenne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 09:39 AM   #5 (permalink)
My dream washboard!
 
Merle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 635

Weight Statistics

11/14/06
Start Date:
305 lb
Start Weight:
239 lb
Current Weight:
140 lb
Goal Weight:
-66 lb
Weight Loss:
12/31/08
Goal Date:
Re: Better diet through genomics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel C. Dechenne View Post
Thanks William! the PCW report sounds familiar, particularly the bit presenting genomics as a panacea.
(By the way, I would very much like to read the entire report but I can't access your link . That's what I've got under the Attached Files sign:To view attachments your post count must be 5 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily. ?????)
In a perfect world, genomics would be developed to screen entire population (poor and rich) to find people with predisposition for ill-health and thus prevent suffuring and stigmatization of individuals as well as reducing cost of health care for the society as a whole. However, we don't live in this ideal world and this trajectory, although often praised as the goal, is not in practice the one favoured by the industry backed up by the governments. Why? I leave this to your own appreciation. I pasted a comment from my 2006 dissertation on the "Trajectories of public research in Nutrigenomics in the US and the EU".

5.1 Will public investments in Nutrigenomics advance the role of nutrition in Public Health?
"As for the US public research system, several exchanges with US experts in the field has suggested to me, in a nutshell: “the product-based approach to nutrigenomics research in the USA might be oriented primarily to the pharmaceutical industry interest rather than the food industry or public health interests. One can make money off genes and small molecules that inhibit their protein products, but it may not be as lucrative to do the same with food. This might be because those “chemicals” (naturally occurring from food) cannot be protected and marketed into blockbuster like drug. The direction of the nutrigenomics research enterprise in the US has generated a large windfall for the pharma industry through basic research they do not have to do or fund in house. The research essentially rules out the genes and proteins that cannot produce some drug. Some nutrigenomics researchers, however, pro personalized nutrition, are trying to change the mindset”. At the end of the day, one might look at the nutrigenomics trajectories in the US more like a game between two industries -drug and food - rather than a race towards enhancing public health. "
Cheers,Rachel
That is strange about your post count, I am sure they will look into it for you. Or you could hurry up and get your 5th post

Welcome to the site by the way!
__________________
Merle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-07, 03:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Obesity Discussion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,851

Weight Statistics

8/1/2006
Start Date:
185 lb
Start Weight:
152 lb
Current Weight:
155 lb
Goal Weight:
-33 lb
Weight Loss:
5/1/2007
Goal Date:
Send a message via AIM to Obesity Discussion Send a message via Yahoo to Obesity Discussion
Re: Better diet through genomics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel C. Dechenne View Post
Thanks William! the PCW report sounds familiar, particularly the bit presenting genomics as a panacea.
(By the way, I would very much like to read the entire report but I can't access your link . That's what I've got under the Attached Files sign:To view attachments your post count must be 5 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily. ?????)
Rachel, I just changed the settings so you (and all members regardless of post count) should now be able to download all attachments.

Welcome to the site, and great first post! Hopefully genomics disposition screenings will be available for everyone with insurance, although that brings up another problem, in that not everyone has insurance.
__________________
Obesity Discussion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 07:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Re: Better diet through genomics

Hi!
I can see the attachement now. But when I try todownload any of them that's the message I get:
"Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator"

Could you do anything?
Happy Easter!
Rachel C. Dechenne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 07:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Obesity Discussion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,851

Weight Statistics

8/1/2006
Start Date:
185 lb
Start Weight:
152 lb
Current Weight:
155 lb
Goal Weight:
-33 lb
Weight Loss:
5/1/2007
Goal Date:
Send a message via AIM to Obesity Discussion Send a message via Yahoo to Obesity Discussion
Re: Better diet through genomics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel C. Dechenne View Post
Hi!
I can see the attachement now. But when I try todownload any of them that's the message I get:
"Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator"

Could you do anything?
Happy Easter!

So sorry Rachel, I'm looking into that as we speak. Thanks for pointing it out, I really appreciate it!
__________________
Obesity Discussion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Genomics, Nutrition, Obesity, and Diabetes Obesity Discussion Scientific Obesity Studies 0 05-20-06 01:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.

Search Module
Enter search criteria:

Advanced Search
Favorite Sites
Weight Loss Programs
Weight Loss
Weight Loss Surgery
Your Link Here
Supporters

Obesity Surgery
Your Banner Here

Google
TOP | Archive | Contact | Logout  

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
 
Designed by Vbulletinskinz.com