Thread: Slowing Down
View Single Post
Old 08-15-07, 11:57 PM   #20 (permalink)
Obesity Discussion
Administrator
 
Obesity Discussion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,960

Weight Statistics

8/1/2006
Start Date:
185 lb
Start Weight:
152 lb
Current Weight:
155 lb
Goal Weight:
-33 lb
Weight Loss:
5/1/2007
Goal Date:
Send a message via AIM to Obesity Discussion Send a message via Yahoo to Obesity Discussion
Re: Slowing Down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
I wouldn't go as far as to say, the nutrient composition above and beyond the baseline requirements don't matter. They certainly aren't as important though.

Weight loss is a function of controlling energy balances.

Nutrients are not energy. They are nutrients.

As long as you supply the body with the correct amount of aminos and fats (the only essentials) and control your calories assuring a deficit.... you'll lose weight.

However, tweaking things seem to make a difference as the nutrients effect the body uniquely.

For instance, having an *extra* pool of aminos floating around in teh bloodstream will ward of muscle breakdown while dieting... which should be recognized as a good thing to any of us.

Or, and I'm not going to get into details here, but how leptin levels are effects by carbohydrate refeeds and such.

So there's more to it IMO than simply meeting the baselines.

That said though, when there's a lot of weight to lose, simply accounting for cals really does the trick. Worrying amount the macros becomes much more important as you get closer to setpoint weight levels.

Great information as always Steve!
__________________
Obesity Discussion is offline   Reply With Quote