View Single Post
Old 02-17-07, 06:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Obesity Discussion
Administrator
 
Obesity Discussion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,815

Weight Statistics

8/1/2006
Start Date:
185 lb
Start Weight:
152 lb
Current Weight:
155 lb
Goal Weight:
-33 lb
Weight Loss:
5/1/2007
Goal Date:
Send a message via AIM to Obesity Discussion Send a message via Yahoo to Obesity Discussion
Obesity ‘link’ to chemicals in womb

Obesity ‘link’ to chemicals in womb



Mark Henderson



Prenatal exposure to chemicals found in plastics and pesticides may leave some people more prone to obesity later in life, a scientist said yesterday.
Research by Fred vom Saal, of the University of Missouri-Columbia, suggested that mice were more likely to put on weight if their mothers were fed compounds that disrupt the normal activity of hormones.
The young mice tended to be born very small but doubled their bodyweight in seven days. They were then more likely to remain obese in adulthood.
While the findings applied only to mice, and there was no evidence for a similar effect in humans, Dr vom Saal said that they were of concern because one compound he studied, bisphenol-A, was often found in babies’ bottles. Such chemicals could be contributing to the rise in obesity, he said.
Independent obesity experts, however, said that the rise in adult obesity had occurred over a period in which average birth weight had gone up, not down. Dr vom Saal suggested that the likely reason explanation for any link was that exposure to chemicals in the womb could encourage a “thrifty” metabolism, in which energy was stored as fat.
“This individual could eat the same and exercise the same as someone with a normal metabolic system, but he or she would become obese while the other person remained thin,” he said Professor Richard Sharpe, of the University of Edinburgh, said that metabolic syndrome disorders were likely to be caused by the combination of several factors, including genetic make-up, lifestyle and diet.
He added: “New research must prove to be repeatable if we are to take it seriously.”
85,000
Approximate number of chemicals being screened by the US Environmental Protection Agency for hormone-disrupting effects
Source: US EPA


Obesity and chemical exposure
__________________
Obesity Discussion is offline   Reply With Quote